Most pro-forma look like this: Take year-1 generation → apply degradation curve → haircut for availability → extrapolate to 30 years in a spreadsheet.
But over 30 years, uncertainties interact and compound:
Weather varies year over year
Modules degrade unevenly, creating growing mismatch losses
Degradation shifts the energy production curve, changing when clipping occurs
Grid curtailment eats into revenue generating electrons
Simple extrapolation can't capture these interactions. Overconfident P50 estimates lead to portfolio shortfalls and underestimated P90 in poorly secured debt.
PowerUQ evaluates millions of scenarios of how weather, equipment, and the grid interact over 30 project years. So your P50, P90 estimates reflect how projects perform, not just best-case year 1 extrapolations.